Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Mayor Pete Buttigieg are also locked in an escalating war of words.

#ABCNews #2020PresidentialRace #WarOfWords

source

By carmodpros

ANGELHOUSE | 2009 - 2022 | HOSTING BY PHILLYFINEST369 SERVER STATS| THE IDIOTS ROBOT AND CONTROL INC. |(RSS FEED MODULE)| ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS (CARMODPROS,COM)

29 thoughts on “Michael Bloomberg facing new accusations of being racially out of touch | ABC News”
  1. Progressive Dems are fucked yo😂😂😂😂

  2. I feel many democratic voters are looking upon the presidential
    candidacy of Mike Bloomberg in a positive light, with his issues and all,
    except for one all important factor, in a word, ‘investment’, would like to
    have been asked to contribute as little as two cents toward his campaign to be
    able to just call it an investment in the future of America, a little sacrifice
    toward good governance not only makes one feel better than just standing on the
    sidelines watching the parade go by, but playing and being a significant part
    of the process…

  3. Michael Bloomberg should be expose for being involved with Jeffrey Epstein and dating ex-girlfriend of Jeffrey Epstein…Ghislaine Maxwell Michael Bloomberg has a lot to explain to the American public

  4. Liz Warren is calling her fellow candidate corrupt.
    This is a page right out of the Republican playbook.
    Would someone please pull the plug on this poisonous woman?

  5. Am I also completely out of touch? As far as I can tell, Cory is definitely the most "well-spoken" among the democratic candidates. He really stands out in the debates, not because of his policies but because of his rhetoric. Bloomberg's tone is definitely somewhere between adulatory and indifferent, and definitely not condescending. Not saying he hasn't enforced laws that had racist consequences, but this seems like a bit of a stretch to me. I'm open to anyone that can change my mind. Tbh they're both shit candidates so idk why this is making headlines.

  6. Bloomberg can't win because he's probably never spoken to anyone who makes under 100K. He has no idea what the American people want and need. He's useless

  7. I’m quite sure that Bloomberg wasn’t trying to make a racist comment, but some people will be offended by anything even if it is a compliment. Being offended by a compliment shows a lack of confidence and sheds light on the offended persons insecurities.
    My father used the analogy “If you throw a rock at a dog pen, the one that hollers is the one you hit.”

  8. Bloomberg is the same as Trump, six in one hand, half dozen in the other. Also, what a hypocrite Elizabeth Warren is. For years she accepted big money donors from Manhattan, Hollywood, Silicon Valley, Martha’s Vineyard…..Now she's Mrs Grassroots? Get the f@ck outta here. Bernie Sanders is no stranger to high dollar donations either. His "The Sanders Institute", founded in 2017 has been known to cash a few large checks as well. It's getting close to Iowa voting time, and there still isn't any dirt on Pete Buttigieg. It's time to make something up, or at the very least make some mountains out of molehills.

  9. Holy Mackerel, Andy ! Get ready for some good ol’ fashion bitch-slapping, hair-pulling, scratching, biting, back-stabbing 💥

  10. Warren is campaigning against the same kind of money
    that she admitted she will accept in the general election.
    So we should vote for her because she will not be a corrupted
    primary nominee because she' not taking this type of money,
    But she would then become a corrupted general election
    nominee because she would at that point accept this type of money?

    Why does it matter that she be a virgin marry primary nominee
    if she ultimately end up becoming corrupted in the general election
    by accepting that dirty money?

    Proof she is only using the issue to beat out her primary opponents
    but really dont care about the issue at all – that for her it's all about winning
    and power, period.

  11. For anyone wondering, it was the "well spoken" part that was considered offensive. Although it seems like a compliment, the implication is that the person is stereotypically considered not well spoken (because they're black), and so referring to them as such is essentially saying "he's not ignorant like those other black folks". Basically, Bloomberg wouldn't have said this about one of the White candidates, or Yang I suppose, because White's and Asians are stereotypically considered educated, "well spoken", et cetera.

Comments are closed.