President Trump came to the defense of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh while some Democrats running for president have called for his impeachment.
READ MORE: https://abcn.ws/2lY6owc

#ABCNews #BrettKavanaugh #MaxStier

source

By carmodpros

ANGELHOUSE | 2009 - 2022 | HOSTING BY PHILLYFINEST369 SERVER STATS| THE IDIOTS ROBOT AND CONTROL INC. |(RSS FEED MODULE)| ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS (CARMODPROS,COM)

23 thoughts on “Kavanaugh faces renewed sexual misconduct allegations l ABC News”
  1. TRUMP COMES TO KAVANAUGH WHILE TRUMP HAS ALREADY BEEN CAUGHT ON FILM grab em by the pussy and trump said already said he would do Ivanka his daughter YOU SICK BASTARDS!!!!!!

  2. Checked out the NYT just now…no retraction. Story just the same as when I first read it. Do a search for 'Brett Kavanaugh' & the articles come up. No retraction does.

  3. Already been debunked. Proves New York Times is Fake News. And all who supported it completely without looking at the real facts is Fake News.

  4. But of course the fact that the accuser isn’t the victim but a former Clinton lawyer who by the way was defending President Clinton during his sexual misconduct allegations during which time Kavanaugh was part of the prosecuting team doesn’t really matter right? Or that he’s accusing Kavanaugh of the exact same thing Clinton was being investigated for… that doesn’t matter either right? Or the fact that even though this supposedly happened prior to the Clinton investigation he didn’t bring it up about an opposing lawyer at the time his client was being investigated for the same thing… that doesn’t matter right? Or that the supposed victim isn’t and hasn’t filed anything or even claimed it happened, and now claims otherwise, and even said she’s being used for political reasons… none of that matters either right? Seriously people. Fair minded, open minded people have moved past the mainstream media. So instead of jumping to a bunch preconceived opinions like most in the so called news media I actually did some research into this before commenting, and to think I couldn’t be more surprised by the mainstream media… well I guess I was wrong… yes I can be more surprised by the mainstream media’s laziness, bias, and apparent unmitigated hatred for people they do not agree with.

  5. Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh is innocent! See Glenn Beck's YouTube video, "Kent Starr & Bill Clinton . . . ." to get a clearer account. In this Glenn Beck video, John Ziegler explains to Glenn "details from the Brett Kavanaugh, NY Times 'Bombshell' story that actually should CLEAR the Justice's name . . . & it is all related to a man named Max Stier, who ironically was a defence attorney for Bill Clinton . . . who was accused of the same thing they're framing Kavanaugh for, now." At that time, Kavanagh was working for Starr on the Clinton impeachment case. Kavanaugh's 1st accuser, K. Ford, had/has no corroborating witnesses. Her best friend (at the time), Leland Kaiser, testified that she has NO recollection of having witnessed what Ford accused the Justice of; however, Kaiser does make it perfectly clear that Ford's allies did wage a fears intimidation campaign, against her, to get Kaiser to lie! Now that Debora Ramirez (the 2nd accuser) has written her book, her witness is Max Stier who is attempting to pin the same accusations Bill Clinton was charged with during his impeachment trial (Stier knows the ins & outs of the case enough to make the Justice seem guilty on the surface; however, Ford Ramirez, & Stier are lacking prosecutory evidence). The public is not clear about Kavanaugh's innocence because the pres has been reporting the facts in a very convoluted style.

  6. Sadly America is slipping into the same declining saga that ripped the Roman empire asunder. Machinations by the vicious Brutus left is tearing the fabric of it's society apart.

  7. There are no new allegations, just recycled ones with the expressed purpose of destroying a good man for the sake of an agenda and politics. The two NYT writers are shameless hacks who could care less about the harm they do as long as it serves to further their careers.

Comments are closed.