Zeroy will be back on the road in no time!
http://LZMFG.com
Brian Crower VQ37VHR PROH625+ Connecting Rods
Wiseco 11.5:1 96mm Forged Pistons
Deck/Bore/Hone by Mazworx

Mall Walker by Audionautix is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Artist: http://audionautix.com/

source

By carmodpros

ANGELHOUSE | 2009 - 2022 | HOSTING BY PHILLYFINEST369 SERVER STATS| THE IDIOTS ROBOT AND CONTROL INC. |(RSS FEED MODULE)| ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS (CARMODPROS,COM)

23 thoughts on “Building a Forged VQ37 – Rotating Assembly”
  1. I'm glad to see Enjuku doing well nowadays. They use to be in a warehouse district in Clermont Fl back in 2009 and they we're just a small business back then. It's cool to see people from Florida doing well and not on he nightly news.

  2. Adam lz “vq is not the best platform for making power” lmao wtf never heard bigger amounts of bullshit in my life

  3. Props on the compression ratio. The greatest break from motorhead tradition I've made so far is to add compression and boost at the same time. Those who don't know and parrot what they hear and read without any experience otherwise will say; Boost, or high compression, not both. What they don't know is that modern engine tech turns that into; Boost & high compression, or turbo lag, not both. A high compression turbo street motor is a street-wrinkler and a transmission crusher. That's what my modern chevy V6 became, only I accomplished the compression ratio noted here on premium fuel with water/meth injection assist, which was important to me because the car needed to be truly streetable and that means being able to pull into any fuel station and pump and go. I didn't hear concrete goals mentioned here to put the power levels into perspective; intended boost level and most helpful to your followers, the concrete limit ranges you established on pump fuel. I believe this info is important for the masses because judging from the overly complicated manner in which this motor is designed, requiring excessive disassembly to access certain key parts (I can remove rods and pistons from the GM V6 with the motor sitting in the engine bay fully mounted for example), suggests that a basic rebuild alone is pretty expensive and time consuming, long before one reaches the cost of forged rods and pistons on a motor whos weak link at the ~500/500 point is the rods. Piston technology is pretty well advanced and the stock piston would probably hold well beyond the stock rod limit established and would be more desirable from the point of the original design compatibility and practicality. Just pointing out some things that make performance more affordable for the masses, who are unwilling, or not able to go all out on expenses, but would like to have a smoking fast car.
    Great job on the demo.
    Here is an example source for what happens when the limit is exceeded;
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HypiYUMvESw

  4. 这就是连续14年的十佳发动机吗, 气门间隙消除器 到底是哪种好?

  5. building…
    why don't you car guys get it, you don't build engines, you assemble engines. There is a difference. You assemble pre built parts. Building something contains making parts from scratch. You are making something that did not exist before. You even wrote rotating ASSEMBLY. -which implies assembling lol

Comments are closed.