Judge Cannon SCREWS Entire JUDICIAL DISTRICT with Stunt

1. from the UK i can clearly see TDS is worse for you guys than Covid. what % of Dems have this syndrome?

2. When is Jack Smith going to end this circus?

3. Get rid of her already jack.

4. Why doesn’t her boss step in….where is her boss. She is making a mockery of the justice system! It is clear she is corrupt a trump voter…..time for someone, anyone who is NOT a freak to step in and remove her! She has not only embarrassed herself. But the whole justice system!!! These are the incompetent justices TRUMP put on the benches during his term….should really open everyone’s eyes as to the types he selects…idiots, corrupt, incompetent!!! Americans deserve better !!! Get involved Boss time to shut this shit show down & get this trial going…it should hv been date set & everyone preparing for trial!!

5. Seems a lot of brains have tilted to upside down.

6. Has a tampon behind her ear and can’t find her pencil.

7. He's found a way to find private citizens to help delay things even more. SMH

8. And yet, she won't set a trial date to deal with the actual crime. 11th Circuit, it's time!!

9. She's a rogue judge is simply allowed by the appellate judges to do as she pleases whether it's lawful or not,

10. Why are they allowing Judge Cannon to do favors for trump. I don't understand how she gets away with this. The Supreme Court is definitely corrupt and it seems there's nothing anybody can do about it. The rules need to be changed for this Supreme Court because they are supposed to uphold the law and they are blatantly corrupt. I don't get it. It's really sad all this for the criminal Donald Trump. What the hell does he have over these judges. 😡

11. Isn't Trump in the Supreme Court giving arguments concerning the President rights to assanate his opponent. Because of article 2 a President can do whatever he wants. Didn't he say all President's. Not if they come for him. Fork tongue 👅😛🤡👿💩

12. She has no clue what she’s doing on such a large case like that, trying to help Trump escape judgement! Jack Smith needs to get her removed and get a Judge that knows what he/she is doing! Why isn’t Jack Smith stopping this circus!!

13. .
    👍 DAVE ARONBERG 👍
    a k a
    👍 THE FLORIDA LAW MAN 👍

14. she is and has embarrassed herself AND the legal fraternity

15. It’s not bizarre now that we’re onto her. SHE is the Constitutional issue in this case.

16. Probably the plan is to make the courts look bad so if Trump gets in there he can say look I will fix the courts ! But do nothing but get the ones he appointed last time to do his bidding

17. finally an intelligent Florida Man

18. Just don't understand how traitor Cannon is still on this case, can't wrap my mind around this BS!!?? 🤯🤬

19. She threw her career away for a criminal.

20. Put her under surveillance and tap her phone!! Is she meeting with trump lawyers/handlers on the side? Is she talking with trumps cult? Can’t you get her out of there already? She has to be consulting with trump and she should be investigated immediately!! So where is homeland security and the FBI and the DOJ and the CIA???

21. The 11th circuit is ridiculous.

22. It seems like Jack Smith would have enough ammo to fire at Cannon, as she was already in hot water. 'Cannon heard Trump’s challenge to the government’s classified-documents investigation, appointed a special master to review the documents, and temporarily barred the Justice Department from using those records in its investigation. That much-maligned decision was later reversed by a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit consisting of three conservative judges: two Trump appointees and the G.W. Bush–appointed Chief Judge William Pryor. They wrote that her decision violated “clear” law and that her approach “would be a radical reordering of our caselaw limiting the federal courts’ involvement in criminal investigations” and “violate bedrock separation-of-powers limitations.”
    
    Now that the same investigation has resulted in an indictment against Trump, Cannon’s prior, fundamentally erroneous approach casts a shadow over the proceedings. Because her earlier handling of this case went well outside the judicial norm and was roundly criticized by the Court of Appeals, reasonable observers of this case could question her impartiality. Federal law has a way to deal with this challenge: Under 28 U.S.C. § 455(a), a judge “shall disqualify himself [or herself] in any proceeding in which his [or her] impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” Cannon’s situation clearly fits that test, and she is obligated to recuse herself in Trump's case.'

Comments are closed.