ABC News’ Pierre Thomas reports on why the name of Julian Assange accidentally appearing in a newly unsealed case could have implications related to the special counsel’s investigation.

source

By carmodpros

ANGELHOUSE | 2009 - 2022 | HOSTING BY PHILLYFINEST369 SERVER STATS| THE IDIOTS ROBOT AND CONTROL INC. |(RSS FEED MODULE)| ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS (CARMODPROS,COM)

27 thoughts on “Secret indictment of Wikileaks founder accidentally disclosed”
  1. So the CIA doesn't want to charge those that did illegal things, but does want to charge a reporter that reported those illegal things.
    More confirmation that the CIA is a corrupt organisation. The CIA is such a rogue agency, it's more likely that the CIA is run by a foreign country than any other organisation.

  2. Never liked that little shit, stop by guantanamo on the way back from the UK for rest and refueling 😎👍🇺🇸💪👊👊👊👊🤳🤜🤛👍

  3. You fail to mention what was in the emails that Assange leaked out. It wouldn't be that they were proof of illegal activities , would it? Illegal democrat activities.

  4. Okay. We finally got down to brass tacks. We will now find out if the podesta emails came through Russians or straight out of the DNC on a flash drive. As far as we have been told it's Russia which Assange denies. He may have been duped but he denies it's the State. He never said it was not Russian in nature. But they still to our knowledge have not interviewed kim.com who was admittedly the digital liaison between the source and WikiLeaks. I still hold that there were two leaks. Russia and one from directly inside the DNC. WAITING FOR EVIDENCE.

Comments are closed.