Why are Apple’s chips faster than Qualcomm’s? – Gary explains

1. Hi everyone. I hope you liked the video. I will be around for a couple of hours monitoring the comments, so if you have any questions please ask and I will try to help.

2. They are not slower they just overheat faster

3. Now its on the Mac

4. Well iphone's latest a13 bionic has been defeated by qualcomm snapdragon 888. I think this is a war where both of them release their new waepons and come at the top and the defeated one shows his new weapon and defeats the previous one. And here exynos does not even stand a chance

5. Android is so resource hungry

6. Business Opportunity in Ruvol

   I have invented a Board Game [still unpublished and not yet out in the market] that I believe is guaranteed to be as challenging and exciting as CHESS. I called it “RUVOL.”

   It is my hope that one day Ruvol may surpass chess as the “Number One Board Game in the World.”

   The weakness of chess is it always starts in fixed positions that the opening moves become “memorizable.” In fact, not a few have so mastered the moves that they can play against their opponents “blindfolded.” It is for this very reason that the great Bobby Fischer introduced his so-called “Fischer Random Chess,” where the starting position of the pieces is “randomized” to make the memorization of openings impracticable. Fortunately, it is also for this reason that I invented Ruvol where “every game” has been calculated to be a challenging one to play.

   HOW IS RUVOL PLAYED and HOW YOU CAN MONETIZE IT?

   I detailed everything in my YouTube video. Here is the link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcqth0m3-R0

   BIG MONEY POTENTIAL IN RUVOL!

   It is worthwhile to note that the people who play chess will be the same people who will play Ruvol. In my Google search, I learned there are around 800 million chess players in the world. Even just a small percentage of these 800 million is good enough to earn big money from Ruvol either as an ONLINE GAME BUSINESS or as a PHYSICAL PRODUCT DISTRIBUTOR.

   You may contact me at: rodolfovitangcol@gmail.com.

   Thanks and God bless!

   RODOLFO MARTIN VITANGCOL
   
   The Ruvol Inventor

7. extremely informative video. now i got the point.

8. Come on Gary we need facts and not prattle

9. The snapdragon 888 invalidates this claim

10. I just discovered this video in 2021, this video is Amazing. FACTS ONLY!!

11. You was able to say everything in 3 minutes!
    Quart an hour for this shit bla bla bla that was horrible!

12. 2021:bruh, what?

13. The only one thing is that apple cheat on the benchmarks testes

14. Top-notch video and presentation 👌

15. 👏🏻👏🏻awesome explanation 👌🏻👌🏻

16. well optimized hardware + software, enough said

17. Wow you really know your stuff, really informative. Just hearing about the battery and performance of the M1 and being a life long windows user wondering if there's anything on the horizon that might compare for windows

18. wrr

19. My man Gary spitting facts, I love android but I respect apple here

20. Even though I loved this video, as with other guys; here is what they are not telling you.

    Ok to Gary Explains. I am your most critical supporter and even though I love your videos for the humor and the facts, but now I want us to be a bit serious.
    Apple Silicon Macs vs the Intel Macs. What your readers need to actually know, is what you and others are not telling them about the facts.

    I just watched Marques Brownlee and he showed some actual benchmarks he ran and he showed a graph about how these compare to some products Apple makes. that use Intel chips.

    So I am gonna provide the info that Apple fans like YOU and Marques aren't gonna tell people. So people, LISTEN IN.

    So I am solely talking about the benchmarks Marques showed based on Geekbench 5 that has been updated and optimized to bench Apple's new chip.

    According to the score on a brand new unboxed 13" Macbook Pro, you can see the numbers at 5:53 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4g2nPY-VZc&t=353s) time of the video, he points at the first chipset that the latest M1 Macbook is faster than. Now here is the research people won't do.

    if you look at the arrow, the chip that was pointed at was a Xeon 2140B. Again, since most people don't understand benchmarks, yes the higher the number the faster the chip. That is obvious right? But what chip is this? First off, the Xeon is not a consumer platform. You usually only see Xeon's install on Servers and Workstation Desktop/Laptops because they provide higher cache vs an i7 which is a more toned down option meant for consumers and the price is also lower.

    But lets talk this chip specifically. The Xeon he pointed to was the Xeon 2140B, which has 8 cores + 8 hyper-threads or (virtual cores). Look up hyperthreading if you are not familiar with the term.
    This chipset is based on Intel Skylake platform which was released in 2015. This chip, was made in 2017. So yes, I would expect that yes, a chip made in 2020, should be faster than a platform that is already 5 YEARS OLD. RIGHT?

    So what chip should we compare then? Well go down his list and you will see an Intel i9-9900HK that scored 6871. The i9 is a consumer oriented ship which is faster than an i7. This i9 came out in Q2 2019 and is also based off Intel's 14NM process of making chips.

    But yet again, we would expect a 2020 chip to be faster than an older generation chip. The Xeon is unfair because it is not a consumer oriented chip and it has capabilities that exceed consumer versions.

    But here is some info. The i7, the i7 Extreme Edition and the Xeon usually share the same platform of each generation is is made from. The major difference between them is how much cache they use and some other facts too. The i7 can be used on the desktop and in many laptops including gaming ones. Based on the usual TDP of the Extreme Edition, it wouldn't work in many consumer laptops, but in workstation laptops with better cooling this would be the fastest thing you can get without getting a Xeon.

    So which chips released by Intel in 2020 are a better comparison? Well again go back to his list of chips. The very first i9 with the highest score is, the Intel i9-10910. It is a 2020 chipset based on Intel's Comet Lake platform, where clock-speed is hitting 5Ghz. As you can see from the list, those chips are benching above 10,000 on multi-score. The gap between Apple latest and Intel latest is much bigger than the gap between Apple's latest vs an i9 based on last years i9 chipset.

    Now this chip has 10 cores. The one I listed is likely a desktop model of the chip, while the laptop version will likely have 6 cores. But even with 6 cores, considering the 3,6Ghz base clock, it will still bench above the M1, but the gap won't be as wide do to less cores, less cache and other factors.

    But you see where I am going? The reason Appel didn't show details in their slides about which chips they are comparing too? Is because they only want you to see the air marketing numbers, because most are not gonna research like I did.

    But I just gave you the true painfully honest tech, because the info I just shows is Apple is selling you a Macbook Pro for $1300, with a chip that is only as fast as Intel that was 5 years ago. And the fact is, you can buy a Windows laptop with 6th generation hardware for about $700 or maybe even less if you look around.

    So is Apple's M1 fast? YES!!! How fast? It is as fast as a computer made as old as 5 years ago, and it is slightly faster than a few options that were made in early 2019. But it is not faster than anything made since Q3 2019 and up until now Q4 2020.

    So if you have an Intel macbook made since 2015-2020? KEEP IT. Wait until Apple deals with the conversion issues of incompatibility, if you are a content creator. if you are a everyday users who just web surfs, social media, watches videos and does lite editing, you could buy these, but they wont be that much better than anything you've purchased since 2017.

21. But the 4G modem on iPhone X was slower

22. 5% faster than snapdragon
    50% more expensive.

Comments are closed.