Justice Department sues Texas over abortion law | WNT

1. Abortion is unconstitutional 🙄

2. I hope the justice department sues the living daylights out of TX's new anti abortion law. Then use 2nd Amendment against Anti abortionists who on fact ARE THE RAPISTS themselves using the Bible and it's book of hate the NEW TESTAMENT as the reason to justify their raping ways. Jesus himself was a rapist. Some fuc n savior POS. Anti abortionists are Bullies, Rapists, Felons. Why because on the one hand they come across as a benevolent fake god promising they will be a person's shield and protector if they just had a favor done for them like fuc ing and carrying their baby. The it gets worse once a woman is pregnant and doesn't want it because it may grow up retarded or some other abnormality are forced to keep, bear, and raise the child alone. The anti abortion right wants to bully a woman during pregnancy and then run away from their responsibilities once the child is born. Hypocrisy of the highest criminal order if you ask me. I would love to see how they would feel and act if they were forced into a situation that forced them to birth someone they could not raise. YOU CAN'T EXPECT TO RAISE A CHILD ON NO MONEY AND JUST BOIL DOWN BIBLE AND NEW TESTAMENT PAGES FOR FOOD THATS MALNUTRITION AND THAT WILL GET YOU BIG TIME JAIL TIME!!!

3. If women can choose so should men. No child support boys!!

4. If a women has a ectopic pregnancy and the pregnancy is allowed to continue it will kill her. So do we wait for the woman to be on her death bed before intervening?
   Ireland changed their abortion laws after a women who became septic with a nonviable pregnancy died. She became sicker and sicker. She was hospitalized and begging for an abortion that would save her life. Doctors feared persecution waiting for her to be closer to death before helping. Their help never came. This is about more than consensual unprotected sex leading to pregnancy. This situation WILL occur in Texas.
   Also I'm wondering if the rapists will have parental rights?

5. Read the article about the ugly history of those border agents. I think the 7th to last paragraph starts with "In 1919" might be interesting to read. Look at the last sentence.

6. Women that use abortion as a contraception is a problem with me. How about women that have more than one abortion? To me thats unacceptable

7. California should instate an anti-gun law that puts a $10,000 bounty, for anyone who buys or supplies guns. Since now that we can skip the constitution.

8. NOW, KEEP IN MIND!
   YOU NOW HAVE NO CONTROL
   OF YOUR BODY!!!
   YOU ARE NOW JUST A WALKING HOLE FOR MEN'S ENTERTAINMENT!!!
   NOW, YOU ARE NO LONGER WHO YOU WERE!!!
   AND, IF YOU WANT TO GET MARRIED, QUESTION YOURSELF… IS HE MARRYING ME, OR WHAT IS BETWEEN MY LEGS, AND A REPLACEMENT OF HIS MOMMY!?!
   ARE YOU HIS MOMMY, WHORE,
   A BABY FACTORY!!!!
   REPUBLICANS, HAVE DECIDED THAT ALL MEN CAN TAKE ADVANTAGE OF ALL WOMEN FOR THEIR OWN ENTERTAINMENT, UNDER ANY
   SITUATIONS, IF YOU LIKE OR NOT!!
   AS THEY HAVE SAID……
   "IF A WOMAN CAN HAVE AN
   ABORTION, THEN WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO RAPE!"
   MAKES SINCE?
   I THINK NOT!!!
   THAT IS TWO DIFFERENT SITUATIONS!!!
   RAPE, IS VIOLENCE AGAINST A WOMAN!!
   SO, WITH THIS VIOLENCE, WE ARE SUPPOSE TO CARRY
   THIS VIOLENCE FOR NINE MONTHS, AND RAISE IT WITH LOVE!!!!!
   REALLY, I THINK NOT!!!
   LET'S JUST BRING BACK
   THE DAYS BEFORE
   ROE vs WADE,
   AND BRING OUT THE OL'
   COAT HANGERS AGAIN, OR THE BACK ALLEY ABORTIONS!!

9. Actually nowhere in the Constitution actually talks about abortion the Supreme Court just say it’s implied Which is a different thing compared to what it actually says word to word on the constitution sooooo

10. The Governor should be fixing the Texas electric grid in the state before another winter storm hits Texas. He is just wasting time and taxpayers money what a disaster 😎😎😎😎😎

11. Libtards are effin anti American. They can't see how unconstitutional it is to deprive children of their fathers using unconstitutional family law system. Courts are actually without any true checks and balances. The current system ignores the constitution on many levels. It is a shame that these liberals crooks can only highlight the issues that harm the society or morals ultimately. Texas law is good and it should be used as a great example by other states as a guiding light.

12. How can he say the most precious freedom is life Itself?! America has the highest maternal mortality rate and infant mortality rate among wealthy and industrialised nations! So even if you make it through the pregnancy, you or the baby might die because America doesn’t actually care about you or the baby, they just care about everyone following their ridiculous ideals.

    A dead person has the right not to donate their organs which could save 8 peoples lives. So at this point in time, a dead person has more rights than a pregnant woman in the state of Texas. Disgusting.

13. Where are the 10.000 USD bounty coming from?

    Why aren’t the same bounties/amounts applied to crimes such as rape or theft?

14. All of you people leaving hate just LEAVE Texas I know nobody wants y’all there anyways nobody is forcing you to stay.

15. Where is someone that loves Texas I’m the comments please show yourselves. I only see hate about Texas. You don’t agree with him saying abortion is wrong don’t make babies or leave Texas

16. The Supreme Court already upheld the law. Murder is illegal. Deal with it. Maybe start making adult decisions about having sex. Personal accountability. What a novel idea.

17. What’s worse rape or murder?

18. U.S. Supreme Court
    
    Larkin v. Grendel's Den, Inc., 459 U.S. 116 (1982)
    
    Larkin v. Grendel's Den, Inc.

    No. 81-878

    Argued October 4, 1982

    Decided December 13, 1982

    459 U.S. 116

    Syllabus

    A Massachusetts statute (§ 16C) vests in the governing bodies of schools and churches the power to prevent issuance of liquor licenses for premises within a 500-foot radius of the church or school by objecting to the license applications. Appellee restaurant operator's application for a liquor license was denied when a church located 10 feet from the restaurant objected to the application. Appellee then sued the licensing authorities in Federal District Court, claiming that § 16C, on its face and as applied, violated, inter alia, the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. The District Court held that § 16C is facially unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause, and the Court of Appeals affirmed.

    Held: Section 16C violates the Establishment Clause. Pp. 459 U. S. 120-127.

    (a) Section 16C is not simply a legislative exercise of zoning power but delegates to private, nongovernmental entities power to reject certain liquor license applications, a power ordinarily vested in governmental agencies. Under these circumstances, the deference normally due a legislative zoning judgment is not merited. Pp. 459 U. S. 120-122.

    (b) The valid secular objective of 16C in protecting schools and churches from the commotion associated with liquor outlets may readily be accomplished by other means. Pp. 459 U. S. 123-124.

    (c) The churches' power under 16C is standardless, calling for no reasons, findings, or reasoned conclusions, and can be seen as having a "primary" and "principal" effect of advancing religion. Pp. 459 U. S. 125-126.

    (d) Section 16C substitutes the unilateral and absolute power of a church for the reasoned decisionmaking of a public legislative body acting on evidence and guided by standards on issues with significant economic and political implications, and thus enmeshes churches in the processes of government and creates the danger of "[p]olitical fragmentation and divisiveness on religious lines," Lemon v. Kurzman, 403 U. S. 602, 403 U. S. 623. Few entanglements could be more offensive to the spirit of the Constitution. Pp. 459 U. S. 126-127.

    662 F.2d 102, affirmed.

    BURGER, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BRENNAN, WHITE, MARSHALL, BLACKMUN, POWELL, STEVENS, and O'CONNOR, JJ., joined. REHNQUIST, J., filed a dissenting opinion, post, p. 459 U.S. 127

    Page 459 U. S. 117

    Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.
    
    Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.

19. Do aborted babies go to heaven or do they have to be baptised first?

20. If we start castrating the rapist. Might work.

21. Didn't knew the Taliban rules Texanistan

22. MEN can't use their strong BODIES 2HURT HUMANS. WOMEN can't use BODIES 2MURDER BABIES UNBORN 👹🇺🇸 REPENT b42late

Comments are closed.