Briefing Room: Barr testifies, Trump’on family seerations, Medicare scam, Israel elections

1. There is current political controversy in Australia, over BANNING "party invitations" being distributed by school children, at school. The "politically correctors" are citing this stance as being : "party pooper".
   What is my stance on it ?
   I absolutely AGREE that it's a FREEDOM measure by BANNING it.
   It's going to level the playing field in terms of reducing NEPOTISM. It's going to prevent " CASE STUDY " and reconnaissance methods: that is, it's going to assist with preventing GATE CRASHERS, friendship forcers, and slow down those "That's Life" magazine reading pump my kids for INFO plus I will pump your kid for info too, while they're attending my own child's "party" . . .those, using this method to gain an in road into anyone's family unit, to fix/form alliances, all the added pressure in so far as travel to and fro, present buying, purchasing time, etc, etc, ALL OF THIS, and, it's going to help prevent a bucket load of acrimony, over who has been invited, and who hasn't, which is SEGREGATION readers, no invites eliminates all of this; but aside from this, our schools are for LEARNING, not a platform for "cool crowd" people, to impose their forms/tactics of SOCIAL ABUSE. And using a "party invite", as a means to deliberately EXCLUDE the young boy/girl who has pissed off the ALPHA students/family a month earlier, because someone elses child, has outperformed the "class toppers" ; during the Under Fifteens Football match a month prior, and so a party is quickly organised to boost the spirit/morale of our "apple of our eye" child, with everyone included, except the student those "parents and friends" have DECIDED, amongst themselves, that any particular "child" needs to be taken down a peg or two, for simply not reacting in a manner that wasn't politically correct enough for them, so it becomes: oh no, you can't invite them because we think they are a bad influence !
   As in : REVENGE gatherings. Right ?
   It's the same thing, as receiving an invitation, from someone, you just don't like, and now HAVE to obligatory "attend." When you just don't want anything to do with it. Understand readers ?
   But outside of this, and just coming from a stance of being an average common Australian readers, what do people think of types who CONSTANTLY mention the latest "party" they're going to ? And everyone knows that personality type. The type who always tries to make out how popular they are, by always mentioning yet ANOTHER party they've been invited to, after the previous one they went to, and the party before that ? Most normal Australians think: "shut up ! Who cares ? Stop trying to make out your social party calendar is full, ya wanker, when it's become as mundane as bills to pay." Right ? I'm sorry party set people, but, most people DO think this, towards people who continually talk : I'm going to another party.
   And it's not jealousy. It's just an apt response to something ANNOYING, that would get on any reasonable person's nerves because it is a form of : my life is better than yours as look at all the parties I go to. . . IT IS readers. It is.
   So, in light of all the aforementioned, I see this as a necessary UNWRITTEN rule, in our school education system. NO PARTY INVITATIONS DISTRIBUTED BY KIDS AT SCHOOL.
   And before all the "That's Life" magazine reading parents and friends start jumping up and down about this FAIRNESS ruling being : "party pooping", or being: getting on "high moral ground". Reread the ruling: no party invites distributed via children AT SCHOOL. Got it ?
   Repeat: AT SCHOOL.
   Because people who opt for this, are doing exactly that ! It is taking: high moral ground when and if you DO, act this way. Not parents who DON'T act this way. There is a time and a place for organising, inviting and attending social parties, and SCHOOL needs to remain exempt from being a platform enabling this DISTRACTION tactic.
   I am thinking of the overall fairness for all my students. It's one less thing imposed, one less confusion causer, one less financial obligation, and one less method of EMBROILING. And one less fight among peers occurring during the party "debriefing" talk also. And the overall lesson needed to be learned here readers is this: In REAL LIFE, everyday is NOT "New Years Eve". And that's all there is to it. The more frequently people party, the more it speaks of an individual who takes it for granted, doesn't view or behave as if it is a special occasion (like a birthday), and, leads to adrenaline junkie constant "high times" seeking, of which, in real life, just isn't REALISTIC.

2. Only the separation was only if the mother had drugs with her this was Obama thing which it is good to separate

3. No such word as "SEERATION"!!!

4. Chump forgot to where his lucky red tie and still he continued to spew lies 😈 incorrigible to say the best

5. WOW……SMH…..and………

6. Will Jonathan Karl volunteer to financially support all of these poor, innocent victims? Will he? Huh??? NOT controversial. ONLY this Dem fake news media pretends to care about these parentally abused kids. I would bring tanks, active duty Army and catapults to fling bodies back into Mexico. Show that on CNN. Maybe that would stop new caravans.

7. what is *seeration*?

8. LIAR!!!!

9. Hold on LET me get on my motorsport, hey you wanna go biking today!? Alright Lu Kang BICYCLE KICKS…..

10. Give me that chair is to looooow lol is not right but is not o.k…

11. LOOK A BRANCH FEEL DOWN THE TREE OMG

12. OMG THIS IS LIKE DESERT YOU KNOW! ALOTTA WATER

13. NOW I CAN SPIT PRETTY FAR YOU WANNA SEE?

14. I need to take allergy pills I can't stop sneezing I have runy nose boogers AAAAAHH! I need visine I have itchy eyes…

15. Who the heck spell checks for yal? A libtard?

16. I FEEL NAUSEOUS I WANNA VOMIT I DON'T FEAL.GOOD

17. Seerations ?

18. I HAVE NO GUN THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT DOES NOT ALLOW ME TO OWN A FIREARM SOMEONE HELP ME PLEASE

19. I HAVE TO KEEP A SMARTPHONE ON MY PERSON THE GOVERNMENT + GOOGLE WANT TO DESTROY ME AND TAKE AWAY EVERYTHING I OWN AN THEY WANT TO INCARCERATE ME FOR THE PLEASURE OF THERE OWN PEOPLE!

20. THESE PIECE OF SHIT AGENCY'S ONLY WANT TO USE YOU FOR MONITORING PURPOSES IT DOES NOT CARE ABOUT YOU OR WHO YOU ARE

21. LAPD IS A PIECE OF SHIT AGENCY AS WELL IT ONLY WANTS TO INCARCERATE ME

22. DO NOT BUY ANYTHING THAT HAS GOOGLE OR LET GOOGLE MONITOR YOUR OWN HOME GOOGLE IS JUST A REPLICA ANKLE MONITOR GOOGLE IS DISGUSTING

23. GOOGLE IS USING ME FOR PURE PLEASURE AN TO SATISFY AUDIENCE WITH MY TYPING

24. GOOGLE RUINED MY IP ADDRESS I HAVE TO MONITOR THE NETWORK METROPCS WITH SAMSUNG BECAUSE MY INTERNET CONNECTION IS ALWAYS GETTING DISCONNECTED

25. GOOGLE SECRETLY TAKES ADVANTAGE OF ME AND MY OWN HOME AND IS REALLY DISRESPECTING MY WHOLE LIFE

26. I DON'T MATTER IS WHAT GOOGLE AND THE U.S. GOVERNMENT IS SAYING ABOUT ME

27. HELP ME TAKE GOOGLE TO COURT AND FILE LAWSUIT

28. GOOGLE IS USING ME AND ILLEGALY MAKING ME BROADCAST FOR MY OWN SAKE

29. GOOGLE HARRASSES AND SPAM CALLS PRIVATE MOBILE USER OVER 4G INTERNET ALSO IS NOT ALLOWING ME TO CHANGE NUMBERS : FUCK GOOGLE VOICE EVERYONE NEEDS TO DROP A LAWSUIT ON GOOGLE IS NOT A REAL PROVIDER IS JUST A BORDER PATROL AGENCY IN DISGUISE GOOGLE AND THE US GOVERNMENT ALREADY DESTROYED MY LIFE IN AMERICA I CANNOT BE EMPLOYED OR WORK ANYMORE MY LIFE IS RUINED

30. That EXIT SIGN smack in the middle of the frame really enhances the background haha

31. This is boring! Show us the tax returns! #TaxCheatTrump

32. Why is this trump not in jail, send him to the Hague to be judged for his crimes, we want a yankee Nurmberg now!

33. Please Israel don't go down the road of fascism!!!

34. Might wanna check your title ABC

35. Third

36. Second

37. First

Comments are closed.